In the New Testament Church
today we often hear the expression “prayer for the sick.” This
is based mostly on the instructions in James Chapter 5 regarding
ministry
to infirm believers.
James
5:14 Is any one of you sick? He should call the elders of the
church to pray over him and anoint him with oil in the
name of the Lord. 15 And the prayer offered in faith will make
the sick
person well; the Lord will raise him up. If he has sinned, he will
be forgiven. 16 Therefore confess your sins to each other and pray
for each other so that you may be healed. The prayer of a
righteous man is powerful and effective.
Note that James teaches both “praying over” the sick
as well as “praying for” each other. These two different
phrases reflect differences in the Greek prepositions. The meaning
of “praying over” someone is not immediately obvious.
Moreover, this is the only instance of this particular expression
in the Bible. The fact that James uses the two different expressions “praying
over” and “praying for” can signify that they
in fact carry different meanings.
What
might “praying over” the sick
mean?
Without discussing the possible meaning of the
expression “praying
over,” let us look at how Jesus and the disciples ministered
to the infirm in the gospels and Acts.
It is not recorded in the gospels that Jesus ever prayed for the
sick as is done by the Church today. At the very least, there is
not recorded a single miraculous healing in which the miracle was
a direct result of his prayer to the Father on behalf of the afflicted
person. Rather, Jesus was able to heal the infirm himself by virtue
of the authority and power over disease which the Father gave him
when he was anointed by the Holy Spirit.
In the same way, it is not recorded that the miraculous healings
performed by the disciples in the gospels were ever a direct result
of their prayer to the Father (or to Jesus) on behalf of the afflicted.
Since Jesus had given them power and authority over demons and
diseases, he sent them out and commanded them to heal the sick.
Luke 9:1 When Jesus had called the Twelve together,
he gave them power and authority to drive out all demons and
to cure diseases,
2 and he sent them out to preach the kingdom of God and to
heal the sick. …6 So they set out and went from village to village,
preaching the gospel and healing people everywhere.
Luke 10:1 After this the Lord appointed seventy-two
others and sent them two by two ahead of him to every town and
place where
he was about to go. 9 Heal the sick who are there and tell them, ‘The
kingdom of God is near you.’
Similarly in Acts, the disciples did not simply
pray for the sick; they healed the sick in Jesus’ name
with the authority given to them by the Lord. The one instance
in Acts where direct prayer
to God was involved in a miraculous healing is found in the final
chapter.
Acts 28:8 His father was sick in bed, suffering from fever and
dysentery. Paul went in to see him and, after prayer, placed his
hands on him and healed him.
Even in this case, the healing took place after
Paul prayed when
he placed his hands on him and healed him.
In light of this, it is surprising that down through the centuries
the Church has clung to the practice of simply praying for the
sick and asking the Father to heal in the name of Jesus Christ.
As we have just seen, support in Scripture for the traditional
way of praying for the sick is relatively weak in comparison to
the voluminous support for directly healing the sick as Jesus taught
and commanded his disciples to do. In Matthew, Mark, Luke, and
John one cannot find a single command from Jesus to his disciples
to pray for the sick as is done by the Church today.
Without a doubt, the sick have been healed through
traditional healing prayer to the Father in Jesus’ name.
God is sovereign and can heal in the way that He chooses, sometimes
in direct response
to prayer or through gifted people. But healing miracles today
are rare by the standards of the Book of Acts where miracles were
powerful, instant, and numerous---spurring the rapid growth of
the Church. Why are such miraculous healings relatively rare in
the Church today?
They are rare primarily because the Church has failed to heal
the sick in the way that Jesus taught and commanded his disciples
2,000 years ago. Healing the sick has rarely if ever been taught
down through the history of the Church. Even in Acts, it is not
clearly recorded that the original disciples taught the new believers
to heal the sick as Jesus had taught them while he was still with
them. Jesus had commanded the original disciples to teach these
things to the later disciples:
Matthew 28:18 Then Jesus came to them and said, “All
authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. 19 Therefore
go and
make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the
Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 and teaching them
to obey everything I have commanded you.
But it is not clear in Acts that the new disciples were taught
to heal the sick and cast out demons in the context of proclaiming
the Kingdom of God to the lost.
At
this time in the history of the Church, it is time to learn what
Jesus taught and commanded his original disciples
to do. If
we do not do this, the Church will not be able to complete the
Great Commission, especially in Third World countries where the
lost demand to see miracles. We can begin by examining the “theology
of helplessness” which has paralyzed the Church for centuries,
if not millennia. According to this theology, believers are completely
helpless to do anything in the realm of the supernatural which
is beyond our natural ability. Our responsibility is simply to
pray and fast and wait patiently on
God to move. Although
there
is some
truth to this, the wholesale acceptance of this theology without
exception has resulted in the weak and almost laughably ineffective
Church that represents Jesus Christ in the very skeptical and fallen
world of the 21st Century.
That
this theology is now prevalent in the Church can be easily demonstrated.
To our ears the phrase “healing the sick” supernaturally
smacks of arrogance, presumption, and false teaching. In contrast,
the
more humble phrase “prayer for the sick” is commonly
used and accepted. But this is not in accordance with Scripture.
It is now time to re-evaluate our precious tradition in light of
the word of God. There is no reason why ministry to the sick today
should be so different from the way in which Jesus and the disciples
ministered to the sick in the gospels and Acts. The only reason
would be that based on the doctrine of cessationism which teaches
that after the passing of the original apostles, miracles ceased.
The Theology of Helplessness